Kupiec And Christoffersen Test

Kupiec And Christoffersen Test 8,4/10 5921 votes

Kupiec test: Kupiec (1995) have proposed to used the likelihood ratio statistic LR uc. Di erent Methods of Backtesting VaR and ES May 17, 2015 19 / 26. Other Methods for Value at Risk We can model the violation series 1 t = 1 fL tVaRt gas a Bernoulli sequence Be(p t), of which under the null hypothesis, p. CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): The purpose of this study is to test predictive performance of Asymmetric Normal Mixture GARCH (NMAGARCH) and other GARCH models based on Kupiec and Chris-toffersen tests for Turkish equity market. Cc to hp conversion. The empirical results show that the NMA-GARCH perform better based on%99 CI out-of-sample forecasting Christoffersen.

  1. Kupiec And Christoffersen Test Center
  2. Kupiec Test Example
  3. Kupiec And Christoffersen Test Strips

The purpose of this study is to test predictive performance of Asymmetric Normal Mixture GARCH (NMAGARCH) and other GARCH models based on Kupiec and Christoffersen tests for Turkish equity market. The empirical results show that the NMAGARCH perform better based on%99 CI out-of-sample forecasting Christoffersen test where GARCH with normal and student-t distribution perform.

Kuiper's test is used in statistics to test that whether a given distribution, or family of distributions, is contradicted by evidence from a sample of data. It is named after Dutch mathematician Nicolaas Kuiper.[1]

Kuiper's test is closely related to the better-known Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (or K-S test as it is often called). As with the K-S test, the discrepancy statistics D+ and D represent the absolute sizes of the most positive and most negative differences between the two cumulative distribution functions that are being compared. The trick with Kuiper's test is to use the quantity D+ + D as the test statistic. This small change makes Kuiper's test as sensitive in the tails as at the median and also makes it invariant under cyclic transformations of the independent variable. The Anderson–Darling test is another test that provides equal sensitivity at the tails as the median, but it does not provide the cyclic invariance.

This invariance under cyclic transformations makes Kuiper's test invaluable when testing for cyclic variations by time of year or day of the week or time of day, and more generally for testing the fit of, and differences between, circular probability distributions.

Dawn of war ultimate apocalypse wiki. Singleplayer is further down the line, theoretically, in case that’s your main interest.TITANSThe mod’s been around for several years, and is popular enough to even have.TITANSThis is quite an old trailer, but gives a sense of what Ultimate Apocalypse is going for:TITANS TITANS TITANSI’ll try and lob in some hands-on thoughts if and when this accursedly slow 1.1GB download finally finishes crawling down its tiny tube, but in the meantime you can grab it from.


Illustration of the two-sample Kuiper Test statistic. Red and blue lines each correspond to an empirical distribution function, and the black arrows show the points distances which sum to the Kuiper Statistic.

The test statistic, V, for Kuiper's test is defined as follows. Let F be the continuous cumulative distribution function which is to be the null hypothesis. Denote the sample of data which are independent realisations of random variables, having F as their distribution function, by xi (i=1,..,n). Then define[2]

zi=F(xi),{displaystyle z_{i}=F(x_{i}),}
D+=max[i/nzi],{displaystyle D^{+}=mathrm {max} left[i/n-z_{i}right],}
D=max[zi(i1)/n],{displaystyle D^{=mathrm {max} left[z_{i}-(i-1)/nright],}

and finally,

V=D++D.{displaystyle V=D^{+}+D^{.}

Tables for the critical points of the test statistic are available,[3] and these include certain cases where the distribution being tested is not fully known, so that parameters of the family of distributions are estimated.

Kupiec And Christoffersen Test Center


We could test the hypothesis that computers fail more during some times of the year than others. To test this, we would collect the dates on which the test set of computers had failed and build an empirical distribution function. The null hypothesis is that the failures are uniformly distributed. Kuiper's statistic does not change if we change the beginning of the year and does not require that we bin failures into months or the like.[1][4] Another test statistic having this property is the Watson statistic,[2][4] which is related to the Cramér–von Mises test.

However, if failures occur mostly on weekends, many uniform-distribution tests such as K-S and Kuiper would miss this, since weekends are spread throughout the year. This inability to distinguish distributions with a comb-like shape from continuous uniform distributions is a key problem with all statistics based on a variant of the K-S test. Kuiper's test, applied to the event times modulo one week, is able to detect such a pattern. Using event times that have been modulated with the K-S test can result in different results depending on how the data is phased. In this example, the K-S test may detect the non-uniformity the data is set to start the week on Saturday, but fail to detect the non-uniformity if the week starts on Wednesday.

See also[edit]


Kupiec Test Example

  1. ^ abKuiper, N. H. (1960). 'Tests concerning random points on a circle'. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series A. 63: 38–47.
  2. ^ abPearson, E.S., Hartley, H.O. (1972) Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Volume 2, CUP. ISBN0-521-06937-8 (page 118)
  3. ^Pearson, E.S., Hartley, H.O. (1972) Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Volume 2, CUP. ISBN0-521-06937-8 (Table 54)
  4. ^ abWatson, G.S. (1961) 'Goodness-Of-Fit Tests on a Circle', Biometrika, 48 (1/2), 109–114 JSTOR2333135

Kupiec And Christoffersen Test Strips

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kuiper%27s_test&oldid=824836165'